Skip to main content

Towards a working definition of Instructional Design

Before starting my journey into the world of ID, I need to understand some key concepts, which sometimes we used interchangeably in a broader sense but that are essential to this discipline. This are not academic definitions, just a general idea to start figuring out the essential components of ID.



Instruction: purposeful activity intended to cause, guide or support learning.

Training: experiences that are focused on acquiring very specific skills for immediate use

Teaching: learning supported by a "teacher" (human interaction)

Education: formal and/or informal process. Life-long.



Magliaro and Shambaugh (2006) highlight that ID is process that construct models to guide the design of learning environment. Their idea of model is intrinsically linked to the notion of system, in that they are an internal representation of a network of concepts (and an explanation of their current functions and possible future interactions). This systematic approach puts the important aspects of learning at the forefront of the designing process.

De Jong, Weinberg, Girault et al (2012) point out that because of its learner-centred character, some authors refer to ID as Learning Design. Also, in relation to the quality of teaching, they argue that ID helps maintain a coherent pedagogy by formalising an unified format of pedagogical design and sequencing.

Merrill (2002) -as a response to criticism against ID- identify a set of principles of instruction which (a) most ID theories and models agree upon, (b) can be implemented using any delivery system or architecture and (c) relate to creating learning environments.Those principles are: problem-based; activation of prior knowledge; demonstration of skills; application of skills and integration of those skills into real-world activities.

As a general statement, we can accept Brown and Green (2016) Instructional Design definition as a process in which available research into how people learn, think, uses ICT and methods of analysis are utilised to create an environment where learning can effectively occur.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Open to Learning

Most people would say that educational leadership is about building relationships. However, Professor Viviane Robinson argues that "a lot of instructional leadership get stuck in the inability" to have conversations about the quality of teaching. Therefore, the real challenge is to integrate building relationships and 'doing the work’. Building these working relationships is not a question of building personal relationships and then “banking” on that relationship to have conversations about work. Staff trust their leadership on the basis of their observation of the leader's ability to do their work and treat people, on the leader's competence and their way of tackling people not being so. “The Open-to-learning™ Leadership approach [is based around teaching] how to build trust in teams and with individuals, while tackling the tough issues associated with the work of school and teacher performance and improvement” (UACEL, 2018). This approach is based on the

Heutagogy: A Holistic Framework for Creating Twenty-First-Century Self-determined Learners

By Lisa Marie Blaschke and Steward Hase Summary Heutagogy is a form of self-determined learning and is a holistic learner centred approach to learning and teaching. It is a theory that has been adopted mainly in e-learning environments and has developing capability, self-reflection and metacognition at its core. In the heutagogial model, self-determined students lead themselves through transformational experiences, becoming good communicators and problem-solvers of real-life scenarios. It was developed as an extension of andragogy and taps into the recent advances in neuroscience. A number of ideas, such as reflective practice; double loop learning; self-efficacy; self-determination and capability have supported the advent of heutagogy. Although some earlier experiments in this area (Steiner and Montessori) have been generally ignored, globalization and complexity are changing the way individuals and institutions interact and obtain information. In this complex environment, cura

Towards a definition of Digital Literacy

As technologies continue to develop, school and school systems become repositories of outdated terminology which, arguably, reflect how slow to respond to change and changing environments they are. The term literacy has evolved from a straightforward "capacity to read and write" to mean "competence or knowledge in a specific area", revealing in its evolution school's struggle to let go old principles. As a consequence of the shift in scholarly happening (as life moves away from paper-based into screen-based communication), terms such as literacy and fluency have seen a number of reinventions and redefinitions. It is beyond doubt that our lives are becoming increasingly permeated by technologies. Think, for example, of the Internet of Things, or Smart TVs or our portable mini-computers (which we still call mobile phones even when nobody actually uses them to talk!). This revolution in social practices has made necessary to define a term that can represent